Direct Control Methods for the Southern Pine Beetle
Kenneth M. Swain Sr. - Staff
Entomologist, USDA Forest Service and Private Forestry, Southeastern Area,
Atlanta, GA, and
Michael C. Remion - Chief, Insect and Disease Section, South Carolina State Commission
of Forestry, Columbia, SC.
United States Department of Agriculture, Combined Forest Pest Research and Development Program, Southern Pine Beetle Handbook, Agriculture Handbook No. 575. March 1981. Adapted from http://everest.ento.vt.edu/~salom/Hndbk575/575.html
In 1974, the U.S. Department of Agriculture initiated the Combined Forest Pest Research and Development Program, and interagency effort that was concentrated on the Douglas-fir tussock moth in the West, on the southern pine beetle in the South, and on the gypsy moth in the Northeast. The work reported in this publication was funded in whole or in part by the Program. This manual is one in a series on the southern pine beetle.
Contents
[ Back ]
The southern pine beetle (SPB) is the most destructive pine bark beetle in the South. In 1979 alone, it killed enough timber to build 34,500 homes. The trees are killed singly, in small groups, or in large numbers over hundreds of acres. Outbreaks commonly originate in poorly managed or overstocked stands. Once underway, an outbreak may last for several years and can spread rapidly into managed stands-including urban areas.
Southern pine beetle spots must be located before they can be treated. Normally, most SPB spots can be detected from the air, particularly during the summer months. Aerial observers use foliage color (red and fading) and number of dying trees to assign a priority for ground checking to each spot. Field crews then ground check the spots to confirm the cause of tree mortality and to determine the need for treatment. Higher priority spots are treated first since they have a greater potential for additional tree mortality than medium- or low-priority spots. Control decisions depend not only on the priority of the spot, but also on the availability of crew and equipment, the size and number of trees or volume of timber in the spot, accessibility, and current market conditions for beetle-killed timber. The criteria presented in tables 1 and 2 should be noted when setting control priorities.
Table 1. Guide to southern pine beetle spot growth and control priorities (May through October).
| Key to Spot Growth | Your spot's classification | Risk-rating points |
| Fresh attacks | absent present |
0 30 |
| Number of freshly attacked trees and those with developing brood | 1-10 11-20 21-50 more than 50 |
0 10 20 40 |
| Pine basal area (or stand density) at active head(s) (ft2/acre) | less than 80 (low density) 80-120 (medium density) more than 120 (high density) |
0 10 20 |
| Average size class of timber (in inches) | pulpwood (9 in or less) sawtimber (more than 9 in) |
0 10 |
Add up the risk-rating points that apply to your spot:
| Score | Control Priority |
| 0-30 | Low |
| 40-60 | Medium |
| 70-100 | High |
Table 2. Symptoms associated with various stages of SPB-attacked trees
| Symptom | Fresh attacks | Developing broods | Vacated trees |
| Foliage | Green | Green trees with larvae; fade to yellow before brood emerges | Red, needles falling |
| Pitch tubes | soft white, light pink | White, hardened | Hard, yellow, crumbles easily |
| Checkered beetles | Adults crawling on bark | Pink or red larvae about 1/2 in long in SPB galleries | Larvae and pupae are purple; occur in pockets in the outer bark |
| Bark | Tight, hard to remove | Loose, peels easily | Very loose, easily removed |
| Color of wood surface | White, except close to new adult galleries | Light brown with blue or black sections | Dark brown to black |
| Exit holes | | Few, associated wit attacking adult reemergence | Numerous |
| Ambrosia beetle dust | | White, localized areas around base of trees | Abundant at base of trees |
Suppression should be a year-round effort. Major efforts should be made from late spring through fall to control actively spreading infestations. Winter and early spring treatment is also important because it will reduce the potential for spot growth and/or new spot development later in the spring and summer. Although infestations are concentrated in fewer trees for longer periods of time during the colder months, the spots are harder to detect from the air.
The landowner's management objectives will definitely influence the selection of one or several treatment methods. Currently recommended treatment methods include (1) salvage removal, (2) cut-and-leave, (3) chemical control, and (4) pile-and-burn. The following paragraphs explain how to perform these four techniques.
Procedures for Salvage Removal
|
![]() |
|
| Figure 3 |
May-October
November-April
|
The cut-and-leave method was first recommended by the Texas Forest Service for controlling small spots (10 to 50 infested trees) that could not be salvaged. This technique involves felling infested trees and a buffer of uninfested trees and leaving them in the woods. The treatment disrupts spot growth and causes emerging adults to disperse into the surrounding forest. Cut-and-leave should be used during the period when SPB spots are expanding (approximately May to October). Spots should be treated only if they contain trees with fresh attacks. The method has been primarily used in the Gulf coast States. |
![]() |
|
| Figure 4 |
Cut-and-leave is practical, relatively inexpensive, and requires a minimum of manpower, equipment, and training. The procedure can be applied soon after spots are detected. The major disadvantage is that a buffer strip of green uninfested trees must be felled around each spot to assure that newly attacked trees, which favor spot growth, are included in the treatment (fig. 4). If salvage becomes feasible at a later date, though , the felled trees can be removed. Larger spots (51-150 trees) can be treated using the cut-and-leave method if the spots will eventually be salvaged.
Procedures for Cut-and-Leave
Insecticides are effective in controlling the SPB in individual trees or small groups of trees. Registered insecticides are available for killing beetles in trees that have been attacked and for preventing attacks on green trees. Although chemical control is costly and subject to environmental constraints, it may be the best alternative in urban forests or high-value recreational areas, and even in limited areas of commercial forests when other methods cannot be used.
The landowner may choose to protect selected high-value trees from attack by applying a preventative spray. Technically, this is not a direct control tactic, but it does prevent attacks and reduce tree mortality in special-use or high-value situations. For short trees, field crews can apply insecticidal sprays with a hydraulic sprayer. Treatment of taller trees usually requires special equipment.
People considering chemical control should contact a local State Forestry office, County Extention Agent or USDA Forest Service, Forest Pest Management office for the latest information on registered insecticides and their use. Always follow label instructions on the insecticide container.
Procedures for Chemical Control
The following procedures are recommended whenever insecticides are used:
|
|
| Figure 5 | Figure 6 |
| Felling, piling, and burning infested trees is one of the oldest SPB control methods and is effective when properly done. But because of high costs and environmental constraints, the practice has been used sparingly in recent years. All the bark must be completely burned to achieve control. It is not necessary to cut, pile, and burn vacated trees. For practical reasons, both infested and vacated trees are usually piled and burned to clear the site for regeneration (fig. 7). Burning can cause wildfires, so it should be restricted to periods of low fire danger. Also, Federal and State air pollution laws must be taken into consideration. | ![]() |
|
| Figure 7 |
Procedures for Piling-and-Burning
Numerous State and Federal laws have been enacted to restrict activities that could have adverse impacts on forest and urban environments. Some of these regulations apply to the control procedures discussed in this handbook. A user should be aware of the regulations that apply to the various SPB control methods(s) described. To get specific information on the proper procedures to be followed in using each control method and in protecting human health and the environment, contact your local State Forestry office or County Extension office.
These recommendations are based on the current guidelines and operational experiences of the USDA Forest Service and State forestry agencies. The authors appreciate the manuscript reviews provided by State and Federal forest pest control specialists throughout the South. The photographs were provided by the USDA Forest Service and South Carolina Commission of Forestry.




Developed by the University of Georgia Bugwood Network in cooperation with USDA Forest Service - Forest Health Protection, USDA APHIS PPQ, Georgia Forestry Commission, Texas Forest Service
and the Pests and Diseases Image Library - Australia
Home | Image Usage | Accessibility Policy | Privacy Policy | Disclaimers | Contact Us
Last updated on Wednesday, August 02, 2006 at 11:40 AM
www.barkbeetles.org version 2.0