Site, Stand, and Host Characteristics of Southern Pine Beetle Infestations
Southern Pine Beetle Handbook U.S.D.A. Combined Forest Pest Research and Development Program Technical Bulletin No. 1612
In 1974 the U.S. Department of Agriculture initiated the Combined Forest Pest Research and Development Program, an interagency effort that concentrated on the Douglas-fir tussock moth in the West, on the gypsy moth in the Northeast, and on the southern pine beetle in the South. The work reported in this publication was funded in whole or in part by the Program. This technical bulletin is one in a series on the southern pine beetle.
Literature Cited
Avery, T. E. 1967. Forest measurements. 290 p. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York.
Belanger, R. P. 1980. Silvicultural guidelines for reducing losses to the southern pine beetle. In The southern pine beetle. R. C. Thatcher, J. L., Searcy, J. E. Coster, and G. D. Hertel, eds. U. S. Dep. Agric. For. Serv., Tech. Bull. 1631. Comb. For. Pest Res. Develop. Prog., Pineville, La.
Belanger, R. P., E. A. Osgood, and G. E. Hatchell. 1979. Stand, soil and site characteristics associated with southern pine beetle infestations in the Southern Appalachians. 7 p. USDA For. Serv., Res. Pap SE-198. Southeast. For. Exp. Stn., Asheville, N.C.
Bozeman, P. P. 1977. Comparisons of several sources of baseline data describing site and stand conditions potentially associated with southern pine beetle infestations. 65 p. M. S. thesis. Stephen F. Austin State University, Nacogdoches, Tex.
Earles, J. M. 1976. Forest statistics for east Texas pineywoods counties. 40 p. USDA For. Serv., For. Res. Bull SO-60. South. For. Exp. Stn., New Orleans, La.
Freese, F. 1967. Elementary statistical methods for foresters. USDA, Agric. Handb. 317. Washington, D.C.
Gould, F. W. 1962. Texas plants-a checklist and ecological summary. 112 p. Texas Agric. Exp. Stn., Misc. Publ. 585. College Station, Tex.
Haines, L. W., S. G. Haines, and F. T. Liles. 1976. Effects of fertilization on susceptibility of loblolly pine to the southern pine beetle. 55 p. Tech. Rep. No. 58. School of Forest Resources, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, N.C.
Hicks, R. R., Jr. 1980. Climatic site, and stand factors. In The southern pine beetle. R. C. Thatcher, J. L. Searcy, J. E. Coster, and G. D. Hertel, eds. U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Serv., Tech. Bull. 1631. Comb. For. Pest Res. Develop. Prog., Pineville, La.
Hicks, R. R., Jr., J. E. Coster, and K. G. Watterston. 1978a. Reliability of field crew judgements concerning site factors associated with southern pine beetle infestations. Southwest. Entomol. 3(1):52-58.
Hicks, R. R., Jr., J. E. Howard, J. E. Coster, and K. G. Watterston. 1978b. The role of tree vigor in susceptibility of loblolly pine to southern pine beetle. Proceedings fifth North American forest biology workshop. p. 171-181. Univ. Florida, Gainesville. [Gainesville, Fla., Mar. 1978.]
Hodges, J. D., and L. S. Pickard. 1971. Lightning in the ecology of the southern pine beetle, Dendroctonus frontalis (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Can. Entomol. 103:44-51.
Ku, T. T., J. M. Sweeney, and V. B. Shelburne. 1976. Site and stand characteristics associated with southern pine beetle in Arkansas. Ark. Farm Res. 25:2.
Lorio, P. L. 1980. Rating stands for susceptibility to SPB. In The southern pine beetle. R. C. Thatcher, J. L. Searcy, J. E. Coster, and G. D. Hertel, eds. U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Serv., Tech. Bull. 1631. Comb. For. Pest Res. Develop. Prog., Pineville La.
Lorio, P. L., and J. D. Hodges. 1971. Microrelief, soil water regime, and loblolly pine growth on wet, mounted sites. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc. 35:795-800
Lorio, P. L., V. K. Howe, and C. N. Martin. 1972. Loblolly pine rooting varies with microrelief on wet sites. Ecology 53:1134-1140.
Lorio, P. L., and W. H. Bennett. 1974. Recurring southern pine beetle infestations near Oakdale, Louisiana. 6 p. U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Serv., Res. Pap. SO-95. U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Serv., South. For. Exp. Stn., New Orleans, La.
Lorio, P. L., and D. O. Yandle. 1978. Distribution of lightning-induced southern pine beetle infestations. Southern lumberman, Jan. issue, 2 p.
MacKinney, A. L., and L. E. Chaiken. 1939. Volume, yield, and growth of loblolly pine to the mid-Atlantic Coastal region. U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Serv., Tech. Note 33. U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Serv., Appalachian For. Exp. Stn., Asheville, N.C.
Morris, C. L., and D. H. Frazier. 1966. Development of a hazard rating for Fomes annosus in Virginia. Plant Dis. Reporter 50:510-512.
Murphy, P. A. 1975. Louisiana forests: status and outlook. U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Serv., Res. Bull. SO-53. U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Serv., South. For. Exp. Stn., New Orleans, La.
Myers, Clifford A. 1977. A computer program for variable density yield tables for loblolly pine plantations. 31 p. U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Serv., Gen. Tech Rep. SO-11. U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Serv., South. For. Exp. Stn., New Orleans, La.
Schumacher, F. X., and T. S. Coile. 1960. Growth and yields of natural stands of the southern pines. 115 p. T. S. Coile, Inc., Durham, N.C.
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. [n.d.] Forest Service Handbook. Sec. 2471.1, R-8, Silvicultural practices handbook. U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Serv., Washington D.C.
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 1972. Forest resource inventory work plan. 99 p. U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Serv., South. For. Exp. Stn., New Orleans, La.
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 1972. Soil resource guide-southern region. 48 p. U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Serv., South. Region, Atlanta, Ga.
Williams, D. L., and W. C. Hopkins. 1968. Converting factors for southern pine products. 89 p. la. State Agric. Exp. Stn., Bull. No. 626. La. Dep. Agric., baton Rouge, La.
Developed by the University of Georgia Bugwood Network in cooperation with USDA Forest Service - Forest Health Protection, USDA APHIS PPQ, Georgia Forestry Commission, Texas Forest Service
and the Pests and Diseases Image Library - Australia
Home | Image Usage | Accessibility Policy | Privacy Policy | Disclaimers | Contact Us
Last updated on Wednesday, August 09, 2006 at 01:52 PM
www.barkbeetles.org version 2.0